Respiratory pathophysiology Case Study Assignment

October 1, 2022

Respiratory pathophysiology Case Study Assignment

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Respiratory pathophysiology Case Study Assignment

Name(s):

Date:

Title of Assignment:

Module 8: Respiratory pathophysiology

Purpose of Assignment:

This assignment will help the student evaluate of a respiratory disorder, which, if untreated, can be a serious condition. Students need to understand respiratory complications and how it can impact ventilation and respiration is important to the study for maintaining homeostasis in the body.

Course Competency(s):

Evaluate pathophysiologic alterations that affect the neurologic and respiratory systems.

Content:

J.S. is a 42-year-old man who lives in the Midwest and is highly allergic to dust and pollen and has a history of mild asthma. J.S’s wife drove him to the emergency room when his wheezing was unresponsive to his fluticasone/salmeterol (Advair) inhaler. J.S. was unable to lie down, and began to use accessory muscles to breathe. J.S. is immediately started on 4 L oxygen by nasal cannula and intravenous (IV) D5W at 75 mL/hr. A set of arterial blood gases is sent to the laboratory. J.S. appears anxious and says that he is short of breath.

Vital signs (VS)

BP = 152/84 HR = 124 bpm RR = 42 Temp = 100.40F

Arterial Blood Gases (ABGs)

pH = 7.31 PaCO2 = 48 HCO3 = 26 PaO2 = 55

Module 8: Respiratory Pathophysiology

Assignment Instructions

Instructions: Please include the following information for this case study: causes of asthma, the symptoms that the client presents and the management of the disorder. Use two evidence-based articles from peer-reviewed journals or scholarly sources to support your findings. Be sure to cite your sources in-text and on a References page using APA format. Refer to the rubric on the final page of this document for submission requirements and details about grading.

Need help finding evidence-based articles? Use this link: http://rasmussen.libanswers.com/faq/208365

Have questions about APA? Visit the online APA guide: https://guides.rasmussen.edu/apa

Part I. Investigate the pathophysiology of asthma and the clinical manifestations of the disease.

What type of asthma do you think J.S. has? Why?
What is the pathophysiology of Asthma? What occurs on the tissue/cellular level to cause the associated clinical manifestations?
What are the clinical manifestations?

Part II. Analyze the case study provided and determine what symptoms support the diagnosis of asthma.

Do you have any concerns with the numbers above (VS & ABG’s in the case study)?
What may be causing (etiology) J.S. to have an exacerbation of asthma?
Identify the treatment provided in the emergency department. What additional therapies are needed to mitigate the asthma symptoms and return the client to wellness?

Part III. Participation: Which group member(s) answered each question?

**As a reminder, each group member must participate in this assignment to receive credit. Failure to participate with your group members will result in a zero on this assignment. Please contact your instructor immediately if you cannot get into contact with a group member.**

Question Number	First and Last Name of Student Assigned to Question/Role
1
2
3
4
5
6
Editor This student will edit the document for clarity, ensure citations are included/accurate, paraphrase direct quotes, etc

References

Grading Rubric:

Levels of Achievement
Criteria	Emerging	Competence	Proficiency	Mastery
Pathophysiology (15 pts)	Did not include discussion on the pathophysiology the respiratory disorder. Failure to provide the pathophysiology will result in zero points for this criteria.	Briefly identified the pathophysiology of the respiratory disorder.	Clearly identified the pathophysiology of the respiratory disorder.	Thoroughly identified the pathophysiology of the respiratory disorder.
	Points: 10	Points: 13	Points: 14	Points: 15
Etiology (15 pts)	Did not include discussion on the etiology of the respiratory disorder. Failure to provide the etiology will result in zero points for this criteria.	Briefly discussed included etiology of the respiratory disorder.	Clearly discussed etiology of the respiratory disorder.	Thoroughly discussed etiology of the respiratory disorder.
	Points: 10	Points: 13	Points: 14	Points: 15
Clinical Manifestation (10 pts)	Did not provide examples of the clinical manifestations of the respiratory disorder. Failure to provide clinical manifestations will result in zero points for this criteria.	Briefly provided clinical manifestations of the respiratory disorder.	Clearly provided clinical manifestations of the respiratory disorder.	Thoroughly provided clinical manifestations of the respiratory disorder.
	Points: 6	Points: 8	Points: 9	Points: 10
Treatment (5 pts)	Did not present treatment for the respiratory disorder. Failure to provide treatment for hematologic disorder will result in zero points for this criteria.	Briefly provided treatment options for the respiratory disorder.	Clearly provided treatment options for the respiratory disorder.	Thoroughly provided detailed treatment for the respiratory disorder.
	Points: 2	Points: 3	Points: 4	Points: 5
APA, Spelling and Grammar (5 pts)	Six or more APA, spelling or grammar errors. Detracts from the readability of the submission.	No more than five APA, spelling or grammar errors, minimally detracts from the readability of the submission.	No more than three APA, spelling or grammar errors. Does not detract from the readability of the submission.	No APA, spelling or grammar errors.
	Points: 2	Points: 3	Points: 4	Points: 5
	Points: 30	Points: 40	Points: 45	Points: 50

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met