Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Review of Elkind Erikson Kohlberg Marcia and Piaget
In Chapters 16 and 17, review the theories of Elkind, Erikson, Kohlberg, Marcia, and Piaget.
Choose one of the hypotheses discussed in the text’s Chapters 16 and 17.
Write a 750-1,000-word paper in which you discuss the chosen theory and how it applies to your interview. In your paper, include the following:
a synopsis of the chosen hypothesis (scholarly evidence required)
a description of the person you’ll be interviewing (gender, age, ethnicity, etc.) (There is no requirement for scholarly evidence)
How the responses of the interviewees support the chosen theory. Give instances to back up your claim. This is where you’ll tie your interview and the responses to your selected hypothesis together. There is no need to offer a list of questions and answers. (Academic evidence is necessary)
In addition to the content, your paper should include at least three scholarly references. 4 scholarly sources are required!
Prepare this work in accordance with the APA Style Guide, which may be found in the Student Success Center. It is necessary to submit an abstract.
A rubric is used in this task. Please study the rubric before beginning the assignment to ensure that you understand the requirements for a successful completion.
This assignment must be completed and submitted to LopesWrite. For more information, see the LopesWrite Technical Support articles.
I strongly advise that you use the following format:
Page 1 of the title
Thesis as an introduction
(In the first paragraph, describe the theory you’ve picked.) Be detailed, and make sure to concentrate on the aspects of the theory that pertain to adolescents, as this is the paper’s main topic.)
Second paragraph of the body (Describe your interviewee)
3rd body paragraph (Connect your interview and the responses to the chosen theory)
Conclusion
Page of references
APPLY THE ATTACHED CHAPTERS. THIS PROFESSOR IS VERY DIFFICULT TO WORK WITH. PLEASE READ THE INSTRUCTIONS ABOVE CAREFULLY.
Reference:
D. Martorell, D. E. Papalia, and R. Duskin-Feldman (2014). From infancy to puberty, a child’s world (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education is a publishing company that specializes on education.
750-1000 characters |.doc file
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Review of Elkind Erikson Kohlberg Marcia and Piaget |
Review of Elkind Erikson Kohlberg Marcia and Piaget