Rhetorical Analysis Project 2 assignment Essay
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Rhetorical Analysis Project 2 assignment Essay
Project 2 assignment sheet
Rhetorical Analysis
For this project, you will be asked to rhetorically analyze one or more academic articles[footnoteRef:1] related to your major (or projected major). That is, you will be asked to fully read and comprehend the article, examine its rhetorical features (see below), and comment on its relevance and effectiveness. The key will be to do a deep dive into the content and context of the academic article you choose. [1: You may want to pick more than one article if they are short and add up to the size of one typical academic article. ]
The kinds of thoughts and questions you should address in your essay:
- Identify the rhetorical features of the texts
- Categorize types of evidence used in the essay(s)
- What is the:
- Rhetorical situation
- Context
- Purpose
- Knowledge (used)
- Audience
- Genre
- (You should give specific examples of each from the text)
- Is the article (truly) relevant to the field?
- Does it make its case effectively?
Requirements:
- You will need to send your rough draft to Tutor.com and post your essay with their comments on Blackboard. You will also need to reflect on their review of your essay (in a paragraph). I will respond to this draft and your reflection on Blackboard.
- 4-5 full pages
- MLA or APA
- Work cited page
· Submit as doc or docx
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Rhetorical Analysis Project 2 assignment Essay