Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Risk Tolerance Questionnaire and Money Market mutual fund
Question Description
What are the results of your Risk Tolerance Questionnaire?39 What type of investor are you? High risk Tolerance Be sure to explain what this designation means, and if you feel that your score accurately reflects your personality regarding investing. Your choices are:
Money Market mutual fund
AAA rated Corporate bond
US Government Treasury Bond
A Corporate Junk bonds
A “Blue Chip” stock
(An emerging market stock)
With this investment philosophy in mind, select one investment from the list above that you feel is the best match for your philosophy. Please explain why you feel this is the best match.
Identify an investment that would best suit Samantha’s and Martin’s level of risk.
Please don’t give this answer below!!!!
Using a generic risk tolerance calculator, I am an aggressive investor. This means that my willingness and capacity to take risk are high. The factors that influence this are my young age (long time horizon for investment), and my alternate sources of income (I do not depend on investment income for my annual expenses). This reflects my personality regarding investing as I do my own investment research, and am always looking out for new opportunities.
The best match for my personality is the emerging market stock. Bond funds and money markets funds do not offer adequately high returns, which is due to their below average risk. Blue chip stocks have higher risk and higher return than bond funds. However, emerging market stock has the highest risk, and also the highest potential return.
As Samantha has an above-average risk profile, Blue chip stock is best suited for her. They are high quality stocks with large market capitalization. As Martin is a conservative investor, Money market mutual funds or AAA rated corporate bonds are best suited for him.
My investment risk tolerance is higher than Martin and Samantha. The investment advised to Samantha has higher risk, but also higher potential return. This is because she has above-average risk profile. The investment advised to Martin is below-average risk, but offers lower potential returns.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Risk Tolerance Questionnaire and Money Market mutual fund |
Risk Tolerance Questionnaire and Money Market mutual fund