Robust Evaluation of The Core Themes Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Robust Evaluation of The Core Themes Assignment
BOOK REPORT: The following are guidelines to what’s required in book report, linked (PDFs)below are some course readings that can be used to grasped more of the content and used within the review to help with questions below.
I have access to book with Kindle cloud reader through amazon.
Book Name: Resonant Leadership: Renewing Yourself and Others with Mindfulness, Hope and Compassion
by Richard Boyatzis and Annie McKee
Your submission should include:
a brief summary and robust evaluation of the core themes of the book;
a discussion of ways you might apply those themes or concepts to your own leadership; and
a description of your recommended target audience(s) for the book
write-up (3 pages maximum, double-spaced)
here’s the link to amazon where you can access kindle cloud easier. will send access as soon as bid on and accepted.
https://www.amazon.com/kindle-dbs/thankYouPage?_en…
p.s Word Count cannot exceed three pages for the description/body.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow