Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Role of the Nurse Manager Presentation
This Week’s assignment is to compare and contrast the role of the nurse executive and the role of the nurse manager.
You will Interview a nurse executive and a nurse manager.
Please address the following:
Identify role differences as follows:
What is the level of organizational influence and authority for decision making as it relates to staffing, retention & recruitment, patient & staff satisfaction, strategic planning, and finance management
What is level of community involvement (colleges, local government, professional organizations)
Whom does this leader report to on the organizational chart? How many people report to this leader?
Explain this leader’s participation in interprofessional teams within the organization, the community, and at the national and global level.
What are the challenges for each role?
What are two examples of past or future plans to restructure within the organization?
What is the role of the nurse executive and the nurse manager in the implementation of restructuring projects?
Analyze your findings of the nurse executive role and the nurse manager role. For example, how are the roles similar and/or different? Compare level of authority and responsibility.
For this assignment you can opt to present the data in a table that addresses all the interview bullet points above. The table must present the data collected during the interview in a concise, relevant, and orderly manner.
All assignments, no matter which method used, must be submitted with a cover page/slide and a reference page/slide.
Slide presentations should not exceed 8 slides of content, excluding cover and reference slides. Audio for each slide should be no more than 1.5 minutes per slide.
Speaker notes must have at least 2-3 sentences per bullet point on each slide.
Power point with voice over
This assignment is a presentation not a scholarly paper.
Voice thread not required; speaker notes would be appreciated!
Denisco, S. M. (2021). Advanced practice nursing: Essential knowledge for the profession. Jones
& Bartlett
Chapter 22
Additional Readings:
Crawford, C. L., Omery, A., & Spicer, J. (2017). An integrative review of 21st-century roles,
responsibilities, characteristics, and competencies of chief nurse executives. Nursing
administration quarterly, 41(4), 297-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000245
Doucette, J. (2019) How to make a solid business case. Nursing Management 50(2) p56 doi:
10.1097/01.NUMA.0000552741.64201.43
qualitative study of the experiences of executive nurses working in England and
Wales. International journal of nursing studies, 59, 169-176.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.04.007
Nix, M. (2017). Nurse Executive professional development. Nursing Management 48(12) 52-53
doi:10.1097/0/aNUMP0000526920. 69840.a3
The AONL provides additional information:
The Role of the Nurse Executive in Patient Safety
The Role of the Nurse in Future Patient Care Delivery
The Nurse Executive to Enhance Clinical Outcomes by Leveraging Technology
The Nurse Executive in Technology Acquisition and Implementation
Role of the Nurse Manager Presentation
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|