Roles in the Judicial System Case Study
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Roles in the Judicial System Case Study
Week 3: Roles in the Judicial System
All members assembled in the courtroom await one person in particular. All rise when that person enters. This person’s physical place in the courtroom is usually at a higher elevation than all assembled, and sometimes that place can be rather ornate. The person is spoken to with deference. One would think that this person is the most powerful in the room.
This week you consider the main roles in the judicial system and the power and responsibility that those roles have.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
Analyze the evolving power of the judge in the criminal justice system
Analyze the roles and relationships of the judge, prosecutor, police, defense, and jury in the judicial system
Compare the power of varied judicial system roles domestically and internationally
Evaluate criminal justice scenarios for judicial role characteristics in practice.
Below Is The Actual Discussion Question You Will Need To Complete Everything That’s Highlighted Will Need Attention To It Please Make Sure You Read And Follow All Directions To Complete The Work. There Is Reading Up Above. Also, I Do Not Have A Rewrite For This Discussion Question So You Will Have To Write This In Your Own Words Sometime This Will Happen When I Can’t Find A Rewrite Paper. Also Make Sure Your Word Count Is No Less Than 150 – 200 Words And Make Sure You Reference Your Work Using Your Own Researched References Unless I Tell You Other Wise Different. Thanks
Discussion: The Judge
The judge now commands everyone to be seated. The trial may proceed.
But how that trial proceeds may have been decided before anyone entered the room. Was a plea deal reached? Is the judge bound by sentencing guidelines? How much power does the judge really have these days? If the judge’s role has changed, how does it differ from bygone eras or original visions of judicial power? In this Discussion, you consider similar questions.
Post a response to the following:
Despite changes in who holds the most power, explain why the judge receives the most deference.
In your response, be sure to incorporate historical influence, institutional practices, and/or political factors to support your position.
In your response, you may incorporate professional experience or insights.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results