Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Roles Of A Community Health Nurse
Florida National University
Research Assignment #2
Purpose
The student will read and understand the different emerging / reemerging infectious diseases discussed in the textbook (chapter 15) and will choose one to develop this project. The student will follow the given questions (1 through 12) that will serve as a guide for this project. Also, the student will explain key concepts and search and evaluate literature relevant to the topic / evidence of literature that supports arguments.
Topics:
Choose any of the recent emerging / reemerging infectious disease discussed in your textbook (chapter 15) (for example: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS – 2002-2003), Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV)- 2015-2018), Avian influenza, H1N1 Influenza (Swine Flu) Pandemic – 2009-2010, Novel Avian influenza A (H7N9) Virus 2013-2017, West Nile Virus, Lyme Disease, Escherichia Coli, Tuberculosis, Ebola virus disease, Zika virus disease).
General directions
Research Paper
Directions and Grading Criteria: Research paper #2
Category | Points | Description |
Introduction
(general) |
5 | The introduction must be clear and concise and be inclusive of brief summary of the intent of your paper. |
Introduction of the disease / problem | 5 | 1. Fully describe the disease / problem you are addressing (explain most recent outbreak – answer the questions where, when, how, consequences). |
Signs and symptoms and diagnosis of the disease | 10 | Describe signs and symptoms of the disease as well as how to diagnose it (diagnostic tests). |
Contributing Factors | 10 | Mention and explain factors that may have contributed to the emergence or reemergence of this infectious disease. |
Goals of Health People 2020 / Prevention and Control of Disease | 10 | 2. Mention the goals of Healthy People 2020 to reduce this infection / Prevention and control of the disease / Infection control recommendation / guidelines. |
3. CDC Response | 10 | Mention and describe the CDC priority for public health response to this specific infectious disease. |
Emerging Antibiotic -Resistant Microorganisms | 10 | Identify antimicrobial-resistant threats in the United States (support your answer with evidence-based research literature (no more than 7 years old). Describe your thought about emerging antibiotic -resistant microorganisms. |
4. Community Health Nurse’s Role | 10 | Describe your role as a community health nurse. Integrate community-level intervention(s) / program (s). Explain its importance. |
5. Research studies | 15 | Mention research studies (at least 3 peer-reviewed journal articles) that validate the information presented through your paper. |
Conclusion | 5 | Summarize the key points you made within your paper. Avoid introducing any new information in this section. |
APA formatting, scholarly writing | 10 | Follow APA 7th Ed. formatting guidelines. Present a scholarly paper without grammatical or sentence structure errors, spelling errors, etc. |
Total | 100 | A quality paper will exceed all of the above requirements. |
Grading Rubric: Research Paper #2
Assignment Criteria | A
Outstanding or highest level of performance |
B
Very good or high level of performance |
C
Competent or satisfactory level of performance |
F
Poor or failing or unsatisfactory level of performance |
Introduction
5 points |
Introduction is clearly conveyed and summarizes the primary intent of the paper. A formal purpose statement is included.
5 points |
Introduction is conveyed and outlines the primary intent of the paper. A formal purpose statement is included.
4 points |
Introduction includes the primary intent of the paper. A formal purpose statement is included.
3 points |
Introduction is vague and/or not included. The primary intent of the paper is not conveyed. There is no purpose statement included; purpose is unclear.
0-2 points |
Introduction of the disease / problem
5 points |
The disease / problem being addressed is fully described (most recent outbreak is fully explained – answering the questions where, when, how, consequences). Includes strong support of scholarly evidence.
5 points |
The disease / problem being addressed is partially described (explain most recent outbreak – answer the questions where, when, how, consequences. Includes support of evidence.
4 points |
The disease / problem being addressed is partially described (partially explain most recent outbreak – answer the questions where, when, how, consequences. Includes support of evidence.
3 points |
The disease / problem being addressed is unclear or difficult to ascertain. The answer to questions where, when, how, consequences) is unclear or incomplete. Does not include support of evidence.
0-2 points |
Signs & symptoms / Diagnosis of the disease
10 points |
Signs and symptoms of the disease as well as how to diagnose it (diagnostic tests) are fully describe
8-10 points |
Signs and symptoms of the disease and / or how to diagnose it (diagnostic tests) are partially describe
6-7 points |
Signs and symptoms of the disease as well as how to diagnose it (diagnostic tests) are partially describe
4-5 points |
Signs and symptoms of the disease as well as how to diagnose it (diagnostic tests) are unclear or difficult to ascertain
0-3 points |
Contributing Factors
10 points |
Mention and explain in details factors (at least 3) that may have contributed to the emergence or reemergence of this infectious disease
8-10 points |
Mention and explain in details factors (at least 2) that may have contributed to the emergence or reemergence of this infectious disease
6-7 points |
Mention and explain factors (at least 2) that may have contributed to the emergence or reemergence of this infectious disease
4-5 points |
Fails to mention / explain factors (or explain only 1) that may have contributed to the emergence or reemergence of this infectious disease. Information is unclear or difficult to ascertain
0-3 points |
Goals of Healthy People 2020 / Prevention and Control of Disease
10 points |
Provides a detailed description of goals of Healthy People 2020 to reduce this infection / Prevention and control of the disease / Infection control recommendation / guidelines.
8-10 points |
Generally, provides description of goals of Healthy People 2020 to reduce this infection / Prevention and control of the disease / Infection control recommendation / guidelines.
6-7 points |
Provides partial description of goals of Healthy People 2020 to reduce this infection / Prevention and control of the disease / Infection control recommendation / guidelines.
4-5 points |
Fails to provide goals/ description of healthy People 2020 to reduce this infection / Prevention and control of the disease / Infection control recommendation / guidelines. Information is unclear or difficult to ascertain
0-3 points |
6. CDC Response
7. 10 points |
Mention and describe the CDC priority for public health response to this specific infectious disease.
8-10 points |
Mention and partially describe the CDC priority for public health response to this specific infectious disease.
6-7 points |
Mention, but not describes the CDC priority for public health response to this specific infectious disease.
4-5 points |
Fail to mention and describe the CDC priority for public health response to this specific infectious disease.
0-3 points |
Emerging Antibiotic -Resistant Microorganisms
10 points |
Correctly and concisely identify antimicrobial-resistant threats in the United States (answer was supported with evidence-based research literature (within last 7 years). . Describe your thought about it. Provides details.
8-10 points |
Identify antimicrobial-resistant threats in the United States,but fails to be concise (answer was supported with evidence-based research literature (within last 7 years). Describe your thought, but not in details.
6-7 points |
Identify antimicrobial-resistant threats in the United States, but fails to be concise. Did not describe your thought or provides details.
4-5 points |
Fails to identify antimicrobial-resistant threats in the United States. Did not describe your thought or provides details.
Information is unclear or difficult to ascertain 0-3 points |
Community Health Nurse’s Role
10 points |
Describe your role as a community health nurse. Integrate community-level intervention(s) / program (s). Explain its importance. Provide details.
8-10 points |
Describe your role as a community health nurse. Integrate community-level intervention(s) / program (s). Explain its importance, but fails to be concise / do not provide details.
6-7 points |
Describe your role as a community health nurse. Integrate community-level intervention(s) / program (s), but may have one or two elements incorrect / or missing elements.
4-5 points |
Fails to state your role as a community health nurse / Integrate community-level intervention(s) / program (s), and/or may have three or more elements incorrect / or missing.
Information is unclear or difficult to ascertain 0-3 points |
Research studies
15 points |
Provides at least 3 research studies that support your paper.
(peer-reviewed journal articles) 12-15 points |
Provides 2 research studies that support your paper.
(peer-reviewed journal articles) 8-11 points |
Provides 1 research study that supports your paper.
(peer-reviewed journal articles) 4-7 points |
Fails to provide research studies that supports your paper. (No peer-reviewed journal article)
0–3 points |
Conclusion
5 points |
Concisely summarizes key points made within the paper.
5 points |
Includes summarization of points made in paper, but might not be concise.
4 points |
Provides conclusion with brief overview of primary points made in the paper. Does not remain concise.
3 points |
Fails to summarize key points made in the paper. Might include new information or conclusion that is unclear/unfocused.
0-2 points |
APA formatting, scholarly writing
10 points |
Writes in a scholarly manner with no grammar, spelling, or syntax errors. Follows the rules of APA formatting.
9-10 points |
Writes in a scholarly manner with minimal grammar, spelling, or syntax errors. Follows the rules of APA formatting.
8 points |
Writes in a scholarly manner with several grammar, spelling, or syntax errors. Breaks minor rules of APA formatting.
7 points |
Does not write in a scholarly manner. Commits many errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax. Does not follow APA format.
0–6 points |
Total Points Possible = 100 points |
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Roles Of A Community Health Nurse |
Roles Of A Community Health Nurse