Ronald Reagan and Jimmy Cater 1980 Election Essay
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Ronald Reagan and Jimmy Cater 1980 Election Essay
Discussion:
Provide a two paragraph, well-reasoned, and defensible argument explaining whether you believe political science is a science or an art. “Well reasoned” means you use the information you have been provided in the text or by me in the “Methodologies” component of this Module to substantiate your claims. As part of this assignment, it is required that you also respond- always respectfully- to at least two other students as to whether you agree or disagree with their assessment.
And no, you cannot make the argument that studying politics is complete poppycock altogether and shouldn’t be studied as either an art or science!! LOL Well, you can, but you better make it convincing! 😉
Assignment:
Please write one FULL page (double spaced in MLA format) explaining which method or methods (explained in the Methodologies section of this Module) you would use to answer this question and why:
Why did Ronald Reagan win the 1980 election against Jimmy Carter?
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Ronald Reagan and Jimmy Cater 1980 Election Essay