Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
RUN Health & Medical Patient Education
4. Select one of the following: limited language proficiency; low health literacy or low digital literacy. Provide an example of how this patient factor could be positively addressed by a clinician and why it would be effective.
5. Select one of the clinician factors: cultural competency; poor communication skills; or unconscious bias. Elaborate on your own experience with clinicians regarding this factor. In what ways might clinicians learn to enhance their abilities of this factor in developing relationships with their patients.
6. Take into consideration healthcare systems. Explain what strides should be made to increase access to language services. In your own experience, have you witnessed any of these services? If so, what were they and do you think they were effective. If you have not, then elaborate on which you think would be most effective based on your location.
https://www.journals.elsevier.com/patient-educatio…
RUN Health & Medical Patient Education
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
RUN Health & Medical Patient Education |
RUN Health & Medical Patient Education