Secondary Survey: Head-to-Toe Assessment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Secondary Survey: Head-to-Toe Assessment
A secondary survey is a comprehensive head-to-toe assessment performed by healthcare professionals to evaluate a patient’s overall condition and identify any underlying medical conditions or injuries that may have been missed during the initial assessment. The purpose of this assessment is to gather more detailed information about the patient’s health status and provide a more accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment plan.
The secondary survey is usually performed after the primary survey, which focuses on assessing and addressing life-threatening injuries or conditions. Once the patient’s vital signs are stable, healthcare professionals can conduct a more thorough assessment.
The head-to-toe assessment starts with the patient’s head and neck. The healthcare professional will inspect the scalp, ears, nose, mouth, and throat for any signs of injury or abnormalities. They will check the patient’s pupils for size, shape, and reaction to light, as well as the patient’s ability to move their eyes in different directions.
Next, the healthcare professional will evaluate the patient’s respiratory system by listening to their lungs for any abnormal sounds or wheezing. They will also check the patient’s chest for any signs of trauma or injury, such as bruising or deformities.
After evaluating the patient’s chest, the healthcare professional will move on to the patient’s abdomen. They will palpate the patient’s abdomen to check for any tenderness, distension, or masses. They will also listen for bowel sounds and check for any signs of organ damage or bleeding.
The healthcare professional will then assess the patient’s extremities, including their arms, legs, and joints. They will check for any signs of fractures, dislocations, or sprains. They will also assess the patient’s range of motion and motor function.
The secondary survey concludes with a neurologic assessment, which includes checking the patient’s reflexes, coordination, and sensation. The healthcare professional will also assess the patient’s mental status and level of consciousness.
In summary, a secondary survey is a detailed head-to-toe assessment that is performed by healthcare professionals to evaluate a patient’s overall condition and identify any underlying medical conditions or injuries. It involves evaluating the patient’s head and neck, respiratory system, chest, abdomen, extremities, and neurologic function. This assessment is critical in providing a more accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment plan for the patient.
Secondary Survey: Head-to-Toe Assessment
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow