- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@collegepaper.us
Self-Portrait Artworks In Schelfhaudt Gallery
Self-Portrait Artworks In Schelfhaudt Gallery
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Self-Portrait Artworks In Schelfhaudt Gallery
ESSAY PAPER ASSIGNMENT
Attend the art opening at the Schelfhaudt Gallery on Feb. 10th at 5:00 pm- 7:30 pm
The paper is due: Feb. 24th. Please turn in the paper to Canvas.
Choose one or two self-portrait artworks that are in the current exhibition in the Schelfhaudt Gallery. Discuss the similarities and differences using vocabulary we’ve learned this semester as well as from the textbook glossary.
DIRECTIONS:
PLEASE GO AND SEE THE SHOW IN PERSON:
*Write No more than one in half pages in length.
(Introduction, body, and conclusion) 3 to 4 pages
12-point font, 1.15 spaced lines
*Cover page (with photo),
*One Footnote page.
Three footnotes from three different sources.
(Example: artist webpage, art magazines, art blogs, and textbook)
Footnote example: “Quoted sentence”.
1) Title of site, website address
“PICASSO in Paris” In Fine Arts Almanac,
http://www.toptags.com/aama/voices/commentary/jeff.htm (25 March 2001).
What category of Art History is the painting or sculpture belonging to?
*Highlight or underline Art Terms
Introduction, body, conclusion
Self-Portrait Artworks In Schelfhaudt Gallery
Bio of the Artist, Visual Analysis, Historical Classification
Some of this paper concentrates on discussing what you see when you look at the work of art. Your professor wants you to base your paper on firsthand observation. Although many people find this type of
assignment difficult because they don’t know what to write about: Concentrate on the basics of Art: line, color, form, size, texture, and hue. Make sure you use plenty of Art Terms / vocabulary to describe what you see. Try asking yourself some of the following questions: What colors are used in the artwork? Do the colors influence the effect the piece has on the viewer? How big is the work? Describe the composition symmetrical,
asymmetrical, what are the forms like? Angular, biomorphic, geometric, what is the medium of the work? How does that influence the total affect of the piece? Where is the work located in the gallery? How is it hung or
displayed? How do you feel when you look at the piece? What do you think the intentions of the artist were? Do you think the artist got his message across to his audience? What category of art history does the
artwork belong to? (Pop Art, Cubism, Surrealism, contemporary, modern). Use artist website and go to the artist statement to read why they create what they do. Use textbook to help with reference. These are just a few questions you might ask yourself to help get started.
Self-Portrait Artworks In Schelfhaudt Gallery
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Self-Portrait Artworks In Schelfhaudt Gallery
