Should We Have Universal Health Care Analysis Paper
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Should We Have Universal Health Care Analysis Paper
Description
Should We Have Universal Health Care?
For this Discussion Board, first read Classic Case File #3 on page 751.
Then, answer the following questions in 3 (or more) paragraphs:
Which theory of justice seems to guide or shape potential opposition to universal healthcare?
Which theory of justice seems to guide or shape support of universal healthcare?
Should the United States establish a system of universal health care? Why or why not?
Case:
Since the dawn of the twentieth century, a debate over health care has raged in America. The debate centers around the argument over whether the federal government is obligated to ensure that its citizens have health care, thus
preventing them from economic headaches associated with rising costs of basic medical care. Historian and sociologist Paul Starr wrote in his book, Remedy and Reaction: The Peculiar American Struggle over Health Care
Reform, that efforts to “provide all Americans access to medical care and protect them from economic ruin” have long been a “liberal inspiration.” Beginning in the early decades of the twentieth century, reform from the
Progressive Era gave Americans antitrust laws, labor legislation, the Federal Reserve and workers’ compensation, but reforming health care proved to be more challenging. Reform has come slowly. After the New Deal, Social
Security was passed to give seniors a fiscal safety net in their later years. Along with Social Security came the GI Bill and the minimum wage. For decades liberals sought a system of universal health care that would protect all
Americans from the pain of illness and burdensome medical bills. With the establishment of Medicare and Medicaid, progressives hoped they had broken through— not so. Starr wrote that “if Americans came to know one thing
about the history of battles over health insurance, it was that a government program to make health care a right of citizenship had always been defeated.” Early ideas for government-led health insurance programs came from
Europe. British national health care and German sickness funds were unpopular and never gained traction in America. Workers compensation shows similarities to German sickness funds, but the idea of national health care
similar to Britain was, to the chagrin of progressives, politely frowned upon in the States. In 1912, progressives within the Republican Party established the Progressive Party that included in its platform support for social health
insurance. Canada boasts a single payer system with striking similarities to the United States’ Medicare system. Progressives had hoped that the Medicare system would serve as a precursor to a more widereaching program to
establish a system for all Americans, offering insurance akin to the coverage offered to seniors by Medicare. . . .In reality, none of the proposals in the United States even closely resembles true government health care like
Britain’s universal health care system. Reality shows that Democrats largely played on Republican turf. Coupling reform with deficit reduction, championing the originally Republican idea of the individual mandate and dropping
advocacy for a government-run “public option” meant that Democrats sought compromise on the bill. They sought agreement on one of the most divisive issues in America’s history. Agreement may have been sought, but discord
was found. Perhaps the fact that the debate requires Americans to draw upon deep-seated ethical principles precludes agreement. Or perhaps the problem is deeper. Perhaps Americans are truly divided over the role government
should play in people’s lives.*
Should We Have Universal Health Care Analysis Paper
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow