Order ID:89JHGSJE83839  Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago  Pages:510 
Instructions:
In this discussion, you will simplify and compare equivalent expressions written both in radical form and with rational (fractional) exponents. Read the following instructions in order and view the MAT222 Week 3 Discussion Example download to complete this discussion. Please complete the following problems according to your assigned number.
Simplify each expression using the rules of exponents and examine the steps you are taking.
Incorporate the following five math vocabulary words into your discussion. Use bold font to emphasize the words in your writing. Do not write definitions for the words; use them appropriately in sentences describing the thought behind your math work.
Principal root
Product rule
Quotient rule
Reciprocal
nth root
Refer to Inserting Math Symbols download for guidance with formatting. Be aware with regards to the square root symbol, you will notice that it only shows the front part of a radical and not the top bar. Thus, it is impossible to tell how much of an expression is included in the radical itself unless you use parenthesis. For example, if we have ?12 + 9 it is not enough for us to know if the 9 is under the radical with the 12 or not. Therefore, we must specify whether we mean it to say ?(12) + 9 or ?(12 + 9), as there is a big difference between the two. This distinction is important in your notation.
Another solution is to type the letters sqrt in place of the radical and use parenthesis to indicate how much is included in the radical as described in the second method above. The example above would appear as either sqrt(12) + 9 or sqrt(12 + 9) depending on what we needed it to say.
Your initial post should be at least 250 words in length. Support your claims with examples from required material(s) and/or other scholarly resources, and properly cite any references.
RUBRIC 

Excellent Quality 95100%

Introduction
4541 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. 
Literature Support 9184 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. 
Methodology 5853 points Content is wellorganized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. 

Average Score 5085% 
4038 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. 
8376 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. 
5249 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. 

Poor Quality 045% 
371 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. 
751 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. 
481 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met 

You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow 
Analyze the Water Footprint Results