Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
SOC 349 Social Significance and Biography Paper
Instructions: Choose ONE of the following prompts and write a 4-page paper (12pt font/double spaced) in response.
Which explanation or explanations do you find most convincing and why? (This last part is opinion, but it should NOT be the focus of your paper). Make sure you indicate the strengths and weaknesses of each historian’s view on the Trials.
How do you explain the importance of violence in the backwoods South? Be sure to use and cite Gorn’s “Gouge and Bite, Pull Hair and Scratch’: The Social Significance of Fighting in the Southern Backcountry” (Week 5 course readings) in crafting your answer. Hint: How would Gorn (historian) use the life and times of Isham to back up his own argument.
Requirements:
If you do not use quotation marks and cite it can be considered plagiarism. Any plagiarism will result in a zero grade and possible further penalties. (See bottom of page.)
Remember: All assignments will be run through turnitin.com – which checks for plagiarized material, including papers found for profit online. If you use a source’s words you must cite, if you do not, it can be construed as plagiarism. Please see the university’s policy on plagiarism (the link is on the syllabus).
Exceeds Expectations | Meets Expectations | Fails to meet expectations | |
Thesis | Student articulates a clear and persuasive thesis that is situated in the appropriate historical literature | Student articulates an identifiable and logical thesis | Student fails to articulate an identifiable and logical thesis |
Organization | Engaging, scholarly introduction and conclusion; coherent and consistent structure; sophisticated transitions; ideas and themes fully developed in separate paragraphs | Functional introduction and conclusion; identifiable transitions (including topic sentences which relate back to thesis); few logical problems | Poor or no introduction and/or conclusion; absence of connections between thesis and paragraphs; few or excessively long or short paragraphs. |
Evidence Analysis | Substantial evidence; courses integrated to clearly and effectively defend the thesis; skilled analysis of sources in light of their historical context | Sufficient evidence; sources credibly used to support a thesis; functional use of primary and secondary sources; analyzes sources in light of their historical context | Use of only one or no sources; if present, sources not analyzed to support thesis; overlooks historical context of documents. |
Style | Skillful attention to sentence structure and word choice; no grammatical errors that inhibit clarity; only minor errors in usage, punctuation, or spelling | Proper sentence structure; few grammatical, mechanical and usage errors, slang, or clichés. | Incoherent sentence structure and word choice; frequent grammatical, mechanical, and usage errors. |
Documentation | Consistent attention to proper format for citation and proper use of sources; highest level of academic integrity. | Sufficient attention to guidelines for citation and proper use of sources; no plagiarism. | Lack of attention to guidelines for citation of sources; evidence of plagiarism. |
SOC 349 Social Significance and Biography Paper
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
SOC 349 Social Significance and Biography Paper |
SOC 349 Social Significance and Biography Paper