Social Engineering Attacks Or Reverse Social Engineering Attacks
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Social Engineering Attacks Or Reverse Social Engineering Attacks
- Take a tour of your building on campus or at work. What is secured at night when workers are absent? Record the location and type of physical access control devices. How do these access controls change at night when workers are absent? How well trained do guards and other employees appear to be? Do they allow “piggy backing” (somebody slipping into a facility behind an authorized individual without being challenged)? What are the policies for visitors and contractors? How does this all impact physical security?
- If possible at either your place of employment or your school, attempt to determine how easy it would be to perform dumpster diving to gain access to information at the site. Are trash receptacles easy to gain access to? Are documents shredded before being discarded? Are areas where trash is stored easily accessible?
- Perform a search on web for articles and stories about social engineering attacks or reverse social engineering attacks. Choose and read five or six articles. How many of the attacks were successful? How many failed and why? How could those that may have initially succeeded been prevented.
- Describe the three basic types of network topologies and provide a sample diagram of each type.
- How are authentication and authorization alike and how are they different? What is the relationship, if any, between the two?
Social Engineering Attacks Or Reverse Social Engineering Attacks
Need reference for every question
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Social Engineering Attacks Or Reverse Social Engineering Attacks