Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Socioeconomic Gap and Uninsured People Discussion
Visit the Health Insurance Coverage of the Total Population page on the Kaiser Family Foundation State Health Facts website. Then, on the provided table, scroll to the Uninsured column, as well as the row with your specific state. Identify the percentage of under-insured people in your state.
Initial Post:
In your initial post, share the percentage of uninsured people in your state and discuss how socioeconomics contributes to the gap in quality of care and access to healthcare.
Response Posts:
When responding to at least two of your peers, consider the following:
Do you agree or disagree with your peers’ discussions on the impact of socioeconomics? Why or why not?
What information shared by your peers surprised you?
How do the videos shared in the Required Resources section relate to your peers’ postings (Does Racism Play a Role in Health Inequities? – YouTube) (Why does health equity matter? – YouTube)
What other aspects of culture might impact this gap in access?
How are your findings different from your peers? What do you think accounts for these differences?
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Socioeconomic Gap and Uninsured People Discussion |
Socioeconomic Gap and Uninsured People Discussion