SPCH219 How to Have Constructive Conversation Essay

SPCH219 How to Have Constructive Conversation Essay

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

SPCH219 How to Have Constructive Conversation Essay

This is two part assignments. Details matters. I will do the video, i just want you to help with the outlines and in part two, we may have to work together to get it done. Part 1 is due by Thursday

PART 1

“The TED style is effective because it’s consistent with how our brains are wired to receive information.” – Carmine Gallo

According to its website, TED is a nonprofit organization “devoted to spreading ideas, usually in the form of short, powerful talks. TED began in 1984 as a conference where Technology, Entertainment, and Design converged, and today covers almost all topics — from science to business to global issues — in more than 100 languages.” (TED, 2016, Our organization) (Links to an external site.)

Since establishing a presence online in 2006, TED Talks are commonly heralded as presentations that resonate; in fact, these online presentations have been viewed more than one billion times.

Please proceed to the “Instructions” section for detailed instructions on your initial post.

 

 

Step One – Find a TED Talk: To analyze a TED presentation, start by finding one that resonates with you. TED.com allows you to search by topic or by speaker. Watch a few speeches until you find one that grabs your attention within the first 30 seconds and keeps you hooked from start to finish. Any TED or TEDx Talk will work for this assignment. Important Note: Please do not select a “Best of the Web” talk, as these presentations were not delivered on the TED stage.

Step Two – Take Notes: Begin your analysis by taking notes while you watch your chosen TED Talk from start to finish for the first time. What are the strengths of the presentation? What are the weaknesses?

Step Three – Develop an Analysis: After completing Steps One and Two, watch your TED Talk a second time. Create a thorough analysis of your chosen presentation by addressing the following five prompts in detail:

Identify the speaker, the title, and the purpose of the TED Talk.

Describe the storytelling in the TED Talk. What are the primary stories told? Where are these stories (introduction, body, conclusion)? Do the stories keep the audience engaged?

How does the TED Talk begin and end? Describe the techniques used to grab the audience’s attention in the introduction and to resonate with the audience in the conclusion.

Describe the speaker’s use of the following from Chapter 8: examples, statistics, testimony, and oral citations. Is the speech well supported overall? Which of these forms of support works best for the audience?

On a scale from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest), rate the TED Talk overall. Describe why you assigned that numerical rating.

Be sure to post your Original Post by the 4th day of the module week.

 

 

PART 2

Step One

Revised Outline: In Module 2, you developed the first draft of your Informative Presentation Outline. In this module, you will revise that outline into a Speaking Outline to best prepare for your Informative Presentation. This presentation will be 4-5 minutes.

What feedback did you receive from your classmates and from your instructor?

Revise your outline with these suggestions.

What did you learn from your Module 3 readings, videos, and lessons? From your other class assignments

Revise your outline incorporating this new knowledge.

In Module 2, you told a 30-second story which was to align with the purpose of the Informative Presentation.

What feedback did you receive from your instructor?

Where in your Informative Presentation will this story best fit?

Revise your outline to include your 30-second story.

Remember that an outline is different from an essay. An outline uses bullet points and phrases versus complete sentences.

Your revised outline should contain the following elements clearly labeled:

 

1. A) Introduction with attention-getter/hook and central idea (use Chapter 10 in The Art of Public Speaking)
2. B) Body with three main points (use Chapter 8 and 9 in The Art of Public Speaking),
3. C) Conclusion (use Chapter 10 in The Art of Public Speaking).

Revise your outline to ensure your presentation is well-structured and engaging from start to finish.

Step Two

Delivering Your Informative Presentation: First, practice delivering your Informative Presentation with a stopwatch so that you can ensure your speech is 4-5 minutes. This may involve cutting, editing, or making additional changes to your Informative Presentation Outline from Step One. Once you are confident in the length of your Informative Presentation, film a video of yourself delivering the speech.

Step Three

Submitting Your Work: To submit your Module 3 – Assignment: Informative Presentation, please include a word processor document with your Revised Informative Presentation Outline from Step One and a video file or a link to your 4-5 minute Informative Presentation.

Reminder

Before posting your video, please ensure that you have met the basic expectations outlined in Instructions on Recording Speeches (PDF) and “How To Guide” on the Module 1 Recording and Sharing Presentations page.

SPCH219 How to Have Constructive Conversation Essay

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!