Stephen King Summary and Reflection Paper

October 12, 2022

Stephen King Summary and Reflection Paper

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Stephen King Summary and Reflection Paper

These are a 150-200-word summary of a reading followed by a 150–200-word focused response to that reading. Note that your response should be more than saying an article is “great,” or “fascinating,” or “I didn’t like it.” These are all responses, and, as such, a valid, even essential, part of your understanding. But such responses don’t help illuminate the subject for anyone – even you – if you haven’t explained how you arrived at your conclusions.

GCU Professional Standards for Educational Leaders Essay

Write a paper of 1,000-1,250 words in which you compare the Professional Standards for Educational Leaders and CEC standards, how they apply to the role of a special education director, and how one’s leadership style can enhance one’s ability to lead gifted and ESL populations in a school district. Include the following in your paper:

Compare the Professional Standards for Educational Leaders and CEC standards.

Discuss the application of the standards in your role as the director of special education services.

Analyze how a leadership style can enhance one’s ability to lead the gifted and ESL populations in a school district.

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met