Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Steps Of Planning Process In The Project Management
College of Administrative and Financial Sciences
Assignment 2
Project Management (MGT323)
Deadline: 20/11/2021 @ 23:59
Course Name: Project Management | Student’s Name: |
Course Code:MGT323 | Student’s ID Number: |
Semester: I | CRN: |
Academic Year:2021-22, I Term |
For Instructor’s Use only
Instructor’s Name: | |
Students’ Grade:
Marks Obtained/Out of 5 |
Level of Marks: High/Middle/Low |
Instructions – PLEASE READ THEM CAREFULLY
Assignment Workload:
Assignment Purposes/Learning Outcomes:
After completion of Assignment-2 students will able to understand the
Assignment-2-Case Study
Assignment Question: (Marks 5)
Please read the Case-7.1 “Alaska Fly-Fishing Expedition.” from Chapter 7 “Managing Risk” given in your textbook – Project Management: The Managerial Process 8th edition by Larson and Gray page no: 241 also refer to specific concepts you have learned from the chapter to support your answers. Answer the questions asked in case study as deliverables where you should consider the milestones and technical requirements. Also refer to the figures from textbook mentioned in the case study. Answers to the deliverables should be within 500 Words limit.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Steps Of Planning Process In The Project Management |
Steps Of Planning Process In The Project Management