Sterilization Race Immigration and Reproductive Control

June 3, 2022

Sterilization Race Immigration and Reproductive Control

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Sterilization Race Immigration and Reproductive Control

I’m working on a history discussion question and need support to help me learn.

Sterilization in the name of health: Race, immigration and reproductive control in modern California

1717 unread replies.1717 replies.

Grade Rubric:

5 points for a 50-word summary. 1 point for each question answered 2 points for one classmate reply. 10 possible points.

3-point deduction for late assignments.

Please submit a 50-word summary. Here is the format.

Title:

Author:

Source:

Short Quote:

50-word summary: (Your summary must have the following. Who, What, When, Where, Why and How)?

You also have to answer the following discussion questions

sterilization and race.pdf (Links to an external site.)

It is okay for a government or society to dictate who should have babies and who should not?
Why was American targeting immigrants from Mexico, Asia, and Eastern Europe for sterilization?
How would you feel if someone in your family went through the sterilization process?

Reply to a classmate

View the following video for reference.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aseQlmKg25U (Links to an external site.)

Loading media…Minimize embedded content

Search entries or author Filter replies by unreadUnread Collapse replies Expand replies

Reply to Sterilization in the name of health: Race, immigration and reproductive control in modern California

Sterilization Race Immigration and Reproductive Control

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met