Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Journal
write 600 words with min 3-4 peer reviewed references
Pick one of the following terms for your research: Strategic leadership, crowdsourcing, strategic planning, SWOT analysis, knowledge management, learning organization, systems thinking, direction setting, transactional leadership, or competitive advantage.
46
Assignment 3: Spokesperson Preparation
For this assignment, we will practice preparing to be a spokesperson for a media conference.
You will be given an overview of an actual crisis case, and your role at the impacted organization. (There will be a few different cases, either from the list in the textbook or recent news examples.)
You will provide the following in your submission:
1. A list of the five most likely questions you will be asked. For each question, you must also identify why you think it will be asked.
2. List what you know about the crisis. (It will be a good idea for you to review the details of the crisis.)
3. List two key pieces of information that you do not know about the crisis and why you think you should know each of them. (It’s good to know where your ‘blind spots’ are.)
2-3 pages (not included title page and references)
Choose 1 crisis case from file 1 and Pick 5 questions from file 2.
For 1. List the 5 questions you choose that you think would be asked and the reason why you think the questions would be asked.
For 2. Base on the crisis case you choose from file 1, list more information that you know about that case. (Some missing information is not mentioned in the case but you find on research)
For 3. Provide 2 key pieces of information that you did not know but you think it is important.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Analyze the Water Footprint Results