Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Strategic Project Management for Supply Chain Management
CM 6030 Strategic Project Management for Supply Chain ManagementModule 1 Case #1 (70 Pts)Turned in MS Word format via Canvas. Please see grading rubric below.You are the lead project manager for an outdoor sporting goods
distribution company called Elite Sports Distribution (ESD) that has annual sales totally $270 million annually. Your company has ambitious plans and has 3 major initiatives cited below. The C-level executives believe that our distribution process must be improved. Of these initiatives, ESD will select one of these projects by the end of the year, only giving 6 months to complete the project selected.Your assignment:
1) Using BOTH the Financial NPV (Use 5 years) and the Payback period, evaluate the best project from a financial standpoint. ESD desired Rate of Return is 15%. Target profit margin is 15%. All your financial work must be shown (can be
copied/pasted from Excel). If you feel any financial data is missing, you may add data, you must note which data and how you came up with that data.2) Using the Multi-Weighted Scoring Model, put together Project Screen Matrix and select a
minimum of 6 criteria and list your justification for the weight of each criteria item.
(2 criteria must include Strategic Fit & Corporate Core Competency). Complete the matrix for your 3 projects and evaluate the best project from a non-financial standpoint. For the weighted Model Score, you can make up numbers in the
weight depending on how heavily you feel that items need rated (Remember there is no wrong answer). Example: if 2 of your categories are 1) Risk to future business 2) Administrative Challenge. Its fair to assume that risk to future business
would be weighted heavier (an 8 for example) vs administrative challenge should be weighted less (a 3 for example). The risk to future business could bankrupt the company, vs, administrative challenge is something to consider, but doesn’t put the company out of business
.3) Write an executive summary using the data from both the financial and non-financial criteria on your selection of which project should be completed and why. There is no requirement for number of pages and justification of your selection reasoning.
Strategic Project Management for Supply Chain Management
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Strategic Project Management for Supply Chain Management