Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Healthcare Study Questions
Competency
Analyze the challenges of improving quality, lowering costs, and increasing access to healthcare.
Student Success Metrics
Select the This item is graded with a rubric link in the Details & Information pane to see the grading rubric for this deliverable.
Scenario
Reforming healthcare delivery to improve quality and value is critical to addressing rising costs, poor quality, and rising uninsured rates. Reforms should improve access to appropriate care in appropriate settings.
You have been hired by the American Medical Association (AMA) to speak to a physician group about various barriers to improving healthcare, lowering costs, and increasing access. The AMA’s event is titled “Healthcare Reform: Understanding the Roadblocks.”
Instructions
Investigate:
Three economic roadblocks to better healthcare
Three non-economic barriers to better healthcare
How to reduce healthcare costs in three ways
Three non-economic healthcare cost-cutting barriers
Three economic impediments to universal healthcare
Abolishing three non-economic barriers to healthcare
Provide the physicians group with data on the economic and noneconomic barriers to improving quality, lowering costs, and increasing access to healthcare in the United States.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Study Questions For Healthcare