Supply Chain Management 

Supply Chain Management

Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839

Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages: 5-10

Instructions:

Description / paper instructions

The coursework assignment for this module is an individual assignment. An assignment plan must be submitted before the individual assignment.

Coursework Brief

Starting from the paper ‘Towards a theory for lean implementation in supply networks’ by Bortolotti et al. (2016), provide a critical Assessment of traditional supplier network management vs. lean supplier network management. Use examples where appropriate.

Guidance on the topic is available from the Module Co-ordinator during weekly office hours/classes

This paper is a PLAN to the coursework on advance. I will place an additional order to this order.
Please make a plan. For example, some Books has a page of index and a details. The professor said he like the PLAN like the details page. Also, the Professor said the source you choose in the PLAN might be used in the Coursework.

The module name is Supply Chain Management.
If you need any additional information here is my access to the blackboard:

tarting from the paper ‘Towards a theory for lean implementation in supply networks’ by Bortolotti et al. (2016), provide a critical Assessment of traditional supplier network management vs. lean supplier network management. Use examples where appropriate.

Guidance on the topic is available from the Module Co-ordinator during weekly office hours/classes

The module name is Supply Chain Management.
If you need any additional information here is my access to the blackboard:

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

xszaFDdxgdr

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!