Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages: 5-10 |
Instructions:
ARTICLE REVIEW(ENT530) : GUIDELINES & TEMPLATE
ENT530 : OCT2020
PRINCIPLES OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP
(ENT530)
INDIVIDUAL ARTICLE REVIEW (20%)
OVERVIEW
This is an individual task. You need to find an article related to entrepreneurship. The article must
be from a journal or high quality conference proceedings. You must have your article or
document approved by the lecturer before you review it. Your review should not read as though
you are the author of the article or material. You are the reviewer of the article, and your review
should read as a review. When you proofread your review, if it reads as though you are the author
of the article or material, your style of writing is not appropriate. The reader should clearly
understand the difference between the author’s contribution and your interpretation and evaluation
of that contribution. Under no circumstance should you copy material from an article and represent
it as your own work. Carefully proofread your work before submitting it.
GUIDELINES FOR CONTENTS
Following is a suggested guideline for preparing your reports. (remember to always use Harvard
Business Style for all formatting and referencing as per the course outline):
1. COVER PAGE
? Student Names, Student ID, Programme and Group
? Lecturers Name
2. INTRODUCTION
? Write an introduction paragraph that informs the reader that you intend to review an
article or other document. Tell the reader the reason why you selected that particular article
to review. The purpose of the introduction paragraph is to prepare the reader for what is to
follow in your review.
3. FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
? State the overall purpose of the article. What was the main theme of the article?
? What new ideas or information were communicated in the article?
? Why was it important to publish these ideas?
? Briefly describe the research methodology.
? What were the basic results or findings from the research?
? Give your impressions of the usefulness of the article. Give your reasons for your
opinions. Write about your opinions of the strengths and weaknesses of the article
in separate paragraphs.
? Please find other sources to support your points or opinion.
4. CONCLUSION
Write a conclusion paragraph that briefly informs the reader what you wrote about in your
review and your overall findings. Relate you opinion with the thesis idea.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |