Synthesis of Sources Paper Assignment
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
Synthesis of Sources Paper Assignment
Description
Objective
The objective of paper 3 is to synthesize research youve summarized in the Annotated Bibliographies and add three additional scholarly references to make the literature review more robust. The synthesis will become the bulk of your final paper (paper 4).Purpose
This assignment will allow students to gain experience identifying key concepts/ideas/data found in the course of researching. You will learn to compare/contrast/critique the insights from secondary sources. In so doing, you will develop your own point of view, theoretical perspective and methods as you examine how others have attempted to answer your research question.Directions: Literature Review Synthesis
In this stage of writing, you will compare, contrast and critique the sources you have identified, adding any secondary sources (arguments of others) you need. You should have between 6 and 9 total scholarly sources in this paper. Additional sources might:
1. fill in gaps in your understanding
2. provide a model for method you might use or adapt in your research design
3. find arguments contrasting or supplementing those youve found alreadyAs opposed to a bibliography, a literature synthesis uses ideas, data, arguments and concepts to organize our writing. Some sources will be more relevant to the research proposal you are designing. Consider how your readings address various aspects of your research question (RQ):
1. Find points of comparison and contrast, particularly disagreement among researchers (They Say)
2. Focus on these shared concepts and ideas as major topics or subtopics in reviewing answers to your RQ
3. Note how some authors emphasize certain parts of your question and ignore other parts
4. Outline how different authors make use of certain types of theory/methods to answer their questions 5. Critique the pieces of scholarship by pointing to the focuses they bring to the topic and what they leave outNote: For stage 3, you will remove irrelevant research that does not fit your RQ as it has become more refined and your understanding of the topic grows. Replace less relevant research with better sources.
Synthesis of Sources Paper Assignment
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Synthesis of Sources Paper Assignment
Synthesis of Sources Paper Assignment