Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Team Communication In The Workplace (BAMG 3312)
Performing research and writing scholarly papers
Marks allotted = 15 points
The assignment’s rationale and goals are as follows:
1. To improve students’ abilities to comprehend, evaluate, and report on scientific papers.
2. To improve students’ capacity to recognize and comprehend concepts and theories related to teamwork management.
3. To improve students’ capacity to recognize and combine relevant sources of information.
4. To help pupils improve their digital literacy and research abilities.
There are a variety of topics to choose from, including:
Only one of the issues must be written about. Choose which of the themes you’d like to write about for your assignment. One of the main qualities of doing well in this evaluation is selecting a topic that you enjoyif you enjoy the topic, you will want to study and write about it!
Topic:
1. In the Workplace, Team Communication
The Student’s Assignment:
Your job is to find, analyze, and explain research articles on the chosen topic. You must communicate in a professional, transparent, and non-technical manner. To do so, you must complete your assignment by selecting papers from various databases (library e-resources, Masader) and search engines (google scholar, etc.). Only articles from the last ten years that are connected to the topic will be considered.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Team Communication In The Workplace |
Team Communication In The Workplace