Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
the academic challenges facing students and institutions
Week 5 Discussion question: Stepping Up
This weeks readings introduced you to the academic challenges facing students and institutions particularly as they relate to the issue of developmental education. Kuh et al. (2010) suggest DEEP institutions share a responsibility for
educational quality and student success that ultimately results in high expectations for student performance.
In this weeks Discussion, you will reflect upon the issues of cost as it relates to sharing the responsibilities of developmental education and the benefits of offering developmental coursework and opportunities to students.
By Day 3
Post your response to the following questions of purpose and responsibility:
Who should be responsible for developmental education?
Who should pay for itstudents, institutions, parents, financial aid, or a combination of these?
What are the implications of these choices for student academic success?
Do the answers to these questions differ at two- and four-year institutions?
the academic challenges facing students and institutions
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
the academic challenges facing students and institutions