Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages: 5-10 |
Instructions:
Word count requirements
The word count for this assignment is
3,000
words.
Use a sans serif font like Calibri or Arial, size 12, double spacing.
–
The word count does not include:
limit.
You must observe the word count specified in this assignment brief. The
School has a policy of accepting variations to the recommended word count of
plus or minus 10%.
The word count includes:
the main text, including in-text reference citations and quotations.
– Appendices. These may be used to include supporting data which may be
too detailed or complex to include as a Table. They are not a device to
incorporate material which would otherwise cause you to exceed the word
– Title page
– Contents page
– Abstract/executive summary
– Tables, figures, legends
– Reference lists
– Acknowledgements
Assignment:
The Changing Nature of Work
3000 words
Please choose ONE of the essays from the titles below:
1) To understand contemporary management, we need to understand its history. To what extent are aspects of earlier 20th Century forms of organisation such as Fordism, Taylorism and Bureaucracy still relevant to management practice today?
2) Covid19 has provided the catalyst for dramatically changing our use of information technologies in the workplace. Evaluate this statement using examples that you are familiar with.
3) Weick (1993) describes organizations as places where humans can learn ways of being or becoming in the world. To what extent does a persons work determine who they are, both as an individual and a member of society?
4) Managing organisation culture is about consensusbuilding. To what extent can management attempts to influence culture overcome resistance, conflict and tension at work? Use two examples to help make your case.
5) Is it important for managers to give consideration to the aesthetics and layout of workspaces? How might the management of space benefit organisations and those who are employed in them?
END OF ASSESSMENT TASK
Example Feedback Form The York Management School
Module code: [module leader please insert] Module Title: [module leader please insert]
Generic marking criteria
G1: Argument
G2: Structure
G3: Use of sources G4: Referencing G5: Presentation
Module specific learning outcomes relevant to this assessment
[module leader please insert from module specification]
S1 Understand how societal norms and legislative structures have helped shape the workplace over time
S2 Understand how the different interests of parties can undermine contractual and relational expectations
S3 Understand how societal norms and management trends have helped shape and change the workplace
S4 Understand the economic, organisational, and socio-psychological mechanisms that can lead to workplace conflict
S5 Recognise the ways contemporary organizations might differ from historic ones and assess a range of management ideas or practises from a critical perspective
Comments on assessment criteria:
The marker will insert feedback based on the generic marking criteria and module specific learning outcomes.
Suggestions for improvement:
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |