The Communication of Research Findings through Academic Writing
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
The Communication of Research Findings through Academic Writing
Academic writing plays a crucial role in the communication of research findings. It allows researchers to share their ideas and results with others in the field, as well as with the broader academic community and the general public. In this paper, we will discuss the various aspects of academic writing, including the different types of academic writing, the audience for academic writing, and the conventions and expectations for academic writing.
The Communication of Research Findings through Academic Writing
One of the most important types of academic writing is the research paper. Research papers are typically written to communicate the results of original research that a researcher or team of researchers has conducted. The research paper is usually divided into several sections, including an introduction, a literature review, a methodology section, a results section, and a conclusion. The introduction provides background information on the topic of the paper and presents the research question or problem that the paper aims to address. The literature review surveys the existing literature on the topic and discusses how the current research builds on or contributes to that literature. The methodology section describes the methods used to collect and analyze data, while the results section presents the findings of the research. The conclusion summarizes the main findings of the paper and discusses their implications. The Communication of Research Findings through Academic Writing
Another important type of academic writing is the review paper. Review papers are similar to research papers in that they report on the results of original research. However, unlike research papers, which focus on the results of a single study, review papers synthesize the results of multiple studies on a particular topic. Review papers are an important way for researchers to stay up-to-date on the latest findings in their field and to identify gaps in the literature that future research could address.
The Communication of Research Findings through Academic Writing
Academic writing also includes other types of writing, such as conference papers, book chapters, and theses or dissertations. Conference papers are shorter versions of research papers that are presented at academic conferences, while book chapters are usually included in edited volumes of scholarly work. Theses and dissertations are longer, more in-depth versions of research papers that are typically required for graduate students in order to obtain a master’s or doctoral degree. The Communication of Research Findings through Academic Writing
The audience for academic writing is primarily other researchers and scholars in the same field. However, academic writing is also read by students, policymakers, and members of the general public who are interested in a particular topic. As a result, academic writing should be written in a clear, concise, and accessible manner, avoiding jargon and technical terms whenever possible.
There are several conventions and expectations for academic writing that authors should be aware of. One of the most important is the use of proper citations and references. Academic writing should always give credit to the sources from which information is drawn. In the sciences and social sciences, the most common citation style is the American Psychological Association (APA) style, while in the humanities, the Modern Language Association (MLA) style is most often used.
Another important convention is the use of a clear and logical organization. Academic writing should be well-structured and easy to follow. It should have an introduction that sets the stage for the rest of the paper, a clear research question or problem that the paper addresses, and a conclusion that summarizes the main findings and their implications.
Finally, academic writing should be written in an objective and impartial manner. Researchers should avoid making overgeneralized statements or drawing unwarranted conclusions from their data. The paper should reflect the data with as much objectivity as possible, avoiding bias as much as possible, and presenting multiple perspectives, when appropriate.
In conclusion, academic writing is an essential tool for the communication of research findings. It allows researchers to share their ideas and results with others in the field and with the broader academic community. By following the conventions and expectations for academic writing, researchers can ensure that their work is.
The Communication of Research Findings through Academic Writing
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow