The Do’s and Don’ts of Admission Letter Writing
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
The Do’s and Don’ts of Admission Letter Writing
When it comes to writing an admission letter, there are a few key things to keep in mind to make sure that your letter is well-received and effective.
Do:
Tailor your letter to the specific program or school you are applying to. Admissions committees want to see that you have taken the time to research their program and that you are a good fit.
Highlight your relevant qualifications and experiences. Make sure to mention any relevant coursework, research projects, or extracurricular activities that demonstrate your interest and aptitude for the field.
Use specific examples to support your claims. Don’t just list your qualifications and experiences; instead, give examples that show how they have prepared you for the program or school to which you are applying.
Proofread your letter multiple times. A well-written letter that is free of grammatical and spelling errors is more likely to make a good impression.
Keep your letter concise and to the point. Admissions committees are busy and may not have time to read a long and detailed letter. Be sure to get your point across in as few words as possible.
Don’t:
Submit a generic letter. Admissions committees want to see that you are genuinely interested in their program and that you have taken the time to research it.
Use overly-flowery language or try to sound overly formal. A letter that is too formal may come across as insincere, while a letter that is too casual may not be taken seriously.
Lie or exaggerate about your qualifications or experiences. Admissions committees can tell when a letter is not genuine and may penalize you for it.
Neglect to thank the admissions committee for considering your application. This shows that you are respectful and polite and it gives you the opportunity to express gratitude and make a lasting impression.
Neglect to include contact information or forget to sign the letter. It’s important that the admissions committee knows how to get in touch with you and have the letter signed.
Overall, an effective admission letter is one that is tailored to the specific program or school, highlights your relevant qualifications and experiences, is well-written, and is free of errors. Remember to proofread your letter multiple times and keep it concise, and be sure to thank the admissions committee for considering your application. And when in doubt, always err on the side of caution and stay honest and respectful.
The Do’s and Don’ts of Admission Letter Writing
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow