The Institutionalization of Business Ethics and Case 10

March 4, 2022

The Institutionalization of Business Ethics and Case 10

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Please submit a 1-page reflection based on Chapter 4: ” The Institutionalization of Business Ethics” and Case 10: ” Google: The drive to balance privacy with profit” to Blackboard. Reflections should include your answers to the questions that are asked to you after each case (called “Questions for Discussion”) based on your understanding of the readings for this week.

Ch 2 (pg84 onwards in the tb)

Describe the stakeholders involved in this ethical dilemma. What stake do they have in the situation?

Are Bill’s actions an ethical issue, a legal issue, or both? Explain your reasoning.

What are some of the risks Ahmed faces if he became a whistle-blower? What are the risks if he remains silent?

Case study (pg439 tb)

Has Google implemented a strategy that serves all stakeholders?

How can Google respect privacy and still maintain its profitability?

How will increasing global regulation of privacy affect Google’s operations?

The Institutionalization of Business Ethics and Case 10

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met