The Life Cycle Of A Plastic Bottle Discussion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
The Life Cycle Of A Plastic Bottle Discussion
I’m working on a environmental science writing question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
After watching the video, answer the following questions.Make sure to put it in your own words, and check for proper spelling and grammar.
Questions:
- Where do plastic bottles begin their life’s journey?
- What are monomers?
- .Explain what happens to Bottle 1.
- What is a leachate?
- How many years does it take for Bottle 1 to decompose?
- Explain how Bottle 2 ends up in the Great Pacific Garbage Patch.
- How is plastic detrimental to marine animals and birds?
- Humans may eventually ingest the plastic from Bottle 2 – explain how this may happen.
- Bottle 2 may break apart to become smaller and smaller pieces called:
- Bottle 3 has a different journey.Describe the process that Bottle 3 goes through.
- What possible products may the last bottle be remade into?Provide at least 3 examples.
The Life Cycle Of A Plastic Bottle Discussion
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow