The Managerial Accounting Course Discussion Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
The Managerial Accounting Course Discussion Assignment
Description
Assess two (2) new areas of knowledge you expanded during this course.
Indicate how these two (2) new areas of knowledge will benefit you in your current or future career.
Description
Explain what other incentives you might think of to make the nudge more effective and why you might use them.
Scenario 2: Nudging
1.Overview:
Regulations aim to modify how individuals or entities respond to situations. Meleyal (2017) described regulations as the legal framework imposed by the government and the rules that prescribe professional conduct.
The author noted that regulations create duties upon entities and give them responsibilities (p. 934). Similarly, nudging, as an experimental process, enable policymakers to test possible outcomes of policy provisions.
The nudge theory draws primarily on behavioral economics to explain why people behave the way they do and suggests ways that the environment of choice can be structured to lead people to make different choices (Meleyal, 2017; Macaulay, 2018).
As such, nudges are methods to achieve rule adherence through a process of influencing decision making. Besides, the Nudge theorists suggest that, in order to influence others, one must present options that make it easy for those we seek to influence to conform.
The Managerial Accounting Course Discussion Assignment
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow The Managerial Accounting Course Discussion Assignment
The Managerial Accounting Course Discussion Assignment