Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Description
Distinguish between “matters of fact” and “relations of ideas” as defined by Hume. Are these two types of knowledge objects? Why do you think that is?
2. Describe why Hume considers cause and effect to be so crucial. What is his conclusion on the external world’s knowledge? Is he right? Why do you think that is?
3. What is the definition of skepticism? What is Hume’s strategy for dealing with skepticism? What are your thoughts on skepticism? Why? What is the best way to write a journal page?
(a) state the philosopher’s or idea’s assumptions and justifications in your own terms;
(b) Apply your own logic to examine these arguments and assumptions. The journal is intended to assist you in starting to work through your views on the arguments/ideas addressed in class. In fact, keeping a journal is the first step toward writing a philosophical paper. As a result, the more effort you put into their journal entries, the easier philosophy papers will be to produce. There is no minimum length requirement for journal entries.
However, each entry must complete both (a) and (b) as outlined above. I recommend at least 1/2 page (typed) for each entry, however the emphasis should be on including (a) and (b) rather than length. Students should avoid plagiarizing in their journals. The journal’s goal is to elicit a personal reaction to the readings. Plagiarism, as you may be aware, inhibits this.
Plagiarism is when you use someone else’s words or ideas and pass them off as your own.
To import material from the internet without a reference, for example. If you use someone else’s thoughts/ideas, you won’t be able to give a personal response to the readings. Plagiarism will result in a failing grade.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
The Philosopher’s Assumptions and Arguments |
The Philosopher’s Assumptions and Arguments