Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
The Protection of Human Health and Safety Discussion
The legal responsibility of the Incident Commander relative to the challenge of the protection of human health and safety verses the responsibility to protect the potential loss of protected natural resources.
The extent to which such potentially dichotomous responsibilities may or may not be, mutually exclusive.
The potential for legal liability on the part of the Incident Commander, relative to failure to either adequately protect human health and safety and / or adequately safeguard against the potential loss of protected natural resources.
Ernest Rutherford is sometimes referred to as the “Father of Radioactivity”. Rutherford made many
contributions to research into radioactivity and the nature of an atom. Outline his contributions.
Who did he collaborate with over the years? In addition to being a researcher he was a mentor to
many other researchers. In 1000 words or less explain his role as a mentor to other researchers and
what their contributions were.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
The Protection of Human Health and Safety Discussion |
The Protection of Human Health and Safety Discussion