The role of intuition in decision-making
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
The role of intuition in decision-making
Intuition can play an important role in decision-making, especially in situations where there is incomplete information or uncertainty. Intuition is often described as a “gut feeling” or a sense of knowing that comes from experience, pattern recognition, and subconscious processing.
Research has shown that intuitive decision-making can be effective in situations where there is not enough time or information to make a fully rational decision. Intuition can help individuals quickly process information and make a decision based on their instincts and past experiences.
However, it is important to note that intuition should not be relied upon solely in decision-making. It can be influenced by biases and personal beliefs, which can lead to flawed decisions. It is important to balance intuition with critical thinking, analysis, and consideration of all available information to make the best decision possible.
Ultimately, the role of intuition in decision-making varies depending on the situation and the individual. It can be a valuable tool when used appropriately, but it should not be the only factor considered in the decision-making process.
The role of intuition in decision-making
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow