The Role of Root Cause Analysis in ERM Programs for Public Safety

July 15, 2021

The Role of Root Cause Analysis in ERM Programs for Public Safety

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

21st Chapter:

https://ebrary.net/9985/management/role root cause analysis public safety erm programs

Please read Chapter 21: The Role of Root Cause Analysis in Public Safety ERM Programs Case and answer the questions below.
1. Use data from sources such as local newspapers, online police reporting, and other sources to identify an emerging crime concern in your town. Identify the restricting and driving forces that may be affecting the issue by framing the scenario.
2. Create a cause-and-effect diagram for the situation using your force field analysis.
You must respond to each question in detail, using 300-350 words each question. Include at least three sources of information. Formatting, quoting, paraphrasing, citing, and listing sources must all adhere to APA guidelines.

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met