The Supreme Court of the United States and the Use of Cameras in Courtrooms
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
The Supreme Court of the United States is the first topic of discussion.
Add an original post to this forum’s discussion subject (remember, one post is expected by Wednesday night) (to do so, just click the “reply” button below). You must also respond to at least two classmates over the week using their first names before Saturda
The following are the questions for the class to discuss (address ALL questions in your postings):
Justices of the United States Supreme Court must go through a three-part procedure, which includes:
The President makes the nomination.
Senate confirmation (today, a majority vote is required) and
The President of the United States appoints
ANSWER ALL OF THE QUESTIONS
Should a simple majority vote (more than 50) be required for someone to be appointed to the Supreme Court of the United States following a lifetime of good behavior? Why do you think that is?
Should Supreme Court Justices require more than a simple majority, such as 60 Senators, to be confirmed? Why do you think that is?
What qualities do you think senators should look for when deciding whether or not to confirm someone?
Should only education and prior legal experience be considered?
Do you believe that how they decide legal issues or previous legal judgements should be considered?
You must back up or explain your point of view, and you may use examples to do so.
Cases before the United States Supreme Court (discussion #2)
Add an original post to this forum’s discussion subject (remember, one post is expected by Wednesday night) (to do so, just click the “reply” button below). You must also respond to at least two classmates over the week using their first names before Saturday.
The following are the questions for the class to discuss (address ALL questions in your postings):
Cases involving homosexual marriage, abortion, and healthcare have all been heard by the Supreme Court. This would include cases such as California’s Proposition 8 and a series of cases challenging the federal Defense of Marriage Act (known as DOMA), abortion cases such as Roe v. Wade and subsequent cases dealing with state-level restrictions, and issues relating to the Affordable Health Care Act, also known as Obamacare. PBS’s Supreme Court Watch website (http://www.pbs.org/newshour/news/supreme-court/) is a good place to start. (This is a link to an external site.) This webpage contains useful information on the Supreme Court as well as current cases.
Discuss with your peers whether the Supreme Court is the proper venue for resolving problems such as gay marriage, abortion, and healthcare.
Should the courts (and consequently unelected judges) or Congress decide significant societal issues?
Do you think the courts (which aren’t concerned with public opinion and are solely concerned with interpreting the law) or Congress (which is concerned with public opinion since it’s how they earn and keep their positions) would make more fair decisions?
Are there any topics, such as gay marriage, abortion, or healthcare, that should be left to the states?
Please defend or clarify your position, and feel free to include examples.
-
Judiciary Response Paper (assignment)
The Judiciary’s Response Paper – For this assignment, choose one of the following alternatives and answer all of the questions about the topic you choose.
In the courtroom, there are cameras.
In the courtroom, there is a discussion about whether or not cameras should be utilized. Some claim that it is advantageous, while others argue that it is inconvenient. Only audio taping of major cases is permitted by the United States Supreme Court. In general, courts do not allow cameras to be used to record sessions, though state legislation may differ. A digital video pilot program is being conducted in 14 federal trial courts. (See the link in the module for Courtroom Cameras.)
First, watch one of the videos on the website Cameras in the Courtroom. It’s worth noting that you can select your video depending on the court’s location, subject content, or procedural concerns.
You should explicitly specify which case you watched in your paper, start with a synopsis of the video and case’s content, and then answer all of the following questions.
Did you get the impression that the camera’s presence had an effect on the people in the courtroom?
You should also consider how you feel about cameras in general in the courtroom. Should they be permitted in all circumstances, only in specific circumstances, or not at all?
Make sure to explain why you came to your opinion and include examples.
OR
Routes to the Bench
At least TWO of the videos chronicling some of the federal judges’ paths to the bench should be watched. The module contains a link.
Your task is to produce a reflection paper that incorporates all of the aspects listed below.
You must keep track of the videos you watched.
Write a summary of the videos’ content.
You must describe the procedure for becoming a federal judge (all three steps).
What variables, in your opinion, should be taken into account during this process?
What are your thoughts on the videos you’ve seen?
Use the text, your knowledge of American politics, and outside sources to back up your claim (if necessary).
The Supreme Court of the United States and the Use of Cameras in Courtrooms
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow The Supreme Court of the United States and the Use of Cameras in Courtrooms