The Symptoms of Anaphylaxis Shock Discussion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
The Symptoms of Anaphylaxis Shock Discussion
***Comment this***
Anaphylaxis is defined as a severe life-threatening generalized or systemic hypersensitivity reaction characterized by rapidly developing airway and/or circulation problems” (Alvarez-Perea, Tanno, &
Baeza, 2017, para. 1). The symptoms of anaphylactic shock include flushing, nausea, vomiting, fever, rash, hives, angioedema, feelings of impending doom, bronchospasm, back pain, and circulatory
collapse (Randall, 2018). Additional symptoms may include hypotension, tachycardia, cyanosis, angioedema, and abdominal pain (Alvarez-Perea et al., 2017). Anaphylactic shock is a medical emergency
and requires immediate attention and treatment. In the event of suspected anaphylactic shock, the first step the nurse should take is to stop administration of all medications, contact the patient’s
physician, assess the patient’s vital signs (including SP02 and breath sounds), and prepare for emergency response (administer 02, I.V. fluids, resuscitative medications). Prior to treating a patient for
anaphylaxis, a nurse should familiarize his/herself with their institutions standing protocols for treating anaphylaxis.
The Symptoms of Anaphylaxis Shock Discussion
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow