The World System of Modern Sport Discussion Project Solution 1

October 5, 2022

The World System of Modern Sport Discussion Project

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

The World System of Modern Sport Discussion Project

I’m trying to learn for my Communications class and I’m stuck. Can you help?

Discussion Response #2:

Nineteenth century Britain was largely responsible for the diffusion of modern sport forms to various “colonial outposts”. However, as a colonial power, Britain may have exploited nations around the world (both in terms of human and natural resources). How was Britain an agent of colonial exploitation around the world? What was the role of sport in Britain’s colonial expansion? How was British sport adopted, negotiated, and/or contest by local populations in regions around the world?

Creative Thinking and Creative Process Presentation

Create a 5–8-page presentation (with 50+ words in the notes section to explain each slide) in which you:

Distinguish between creative thinking and the creative process.

Select one approach to the creative process and explain how it would foster creativity in an environment of your choosing: work, school, home, or otherwise.

Explain the differences between method and theory in the study of creativity.

What is the role of each in the study of creativity?

How do they work together in the study of creativity?

Explain the role of personal psychology in creativity.

How does personal psychology relate to creativity?

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met