Thistle Waite and Wooldridge Case Study Assignment

March 22, 2022

Thistle Waite and Wooldridge Case Study Assignment

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Thistle Waite and Wooldridge Case Study Assignment

Assigned Reading: Thistle Waite and Wooldridge, Part 1, Chapter 6, Female Police Officers: Do female police officers perform as well as male officers? pp. 115-123.

After reading the article answer the following questions in a discussion posting:

You must also comment on two of your classmate’s postings by the end of the week.

Do you think the methodology used to complete this study was valid?
What limitations do you see, if any, in the way the study was conducted?
Given the fact that female officers are part of most mainstream police agencies are these findings any different today than in 1974? Why or Why not?

Answer the following questions in a conversation once you’ve finished reading the article:

Also, at the end of the week, you must respond to two other students’ posts.

Do you believe the research technique was sound?

Is there any way the research might have been done better?

Are these results any different now than they were in 1974, given the fact that most major police organizations employ female officers? If not, then why not?

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met