Traumatic Experience in the Diaspora Communities Discussion
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
Traumatic Experience in the Diaspora Communities Discussion
This is the prompt I have attached the readings,. lecture notes and will attach the class recordings that will help you answer this prompt 🙂
Prompt: Discuss the difference between Hamid Naficy’s categories of accented cinema: the exilic, the diasporic, and the ethnic. What does he mean by saying that: “Not allaccented films are exilic or diasporic, but all exilic or diasporic films are accented”?
Please use all the feedback as usual that I have given you in the past 500-word essay questions i need help with also in terms of writing style here is a classmate’s notes:
Naficy covers an important aspect of filmmaking where the makers are influenced in their works by their roots and origins in a postcolonial/Third World country. The feeling
around this displacement from one country to another is always evident in the ways filmmakers keep few things that are only specific to their countries of origin, meanwhile
also adapting some of those ideas around more western ways of thinking. The technological advancements, the possibilities for better self-expression found in the northern centers gives these filmmakers a better outlet for their art. I wonder, is it ever possible to fully leave the “homeland” out of the art and the cinema that they are making? I tend
to believe not. Given that exile or just simply “escaping” has a serious impact on those that have to do so makingfilms out of these heavy feelings of displacement can be quite
useful in sending a message or simply trying to find one’s style. Do these filmmakers realize their different ways of approaching the world around them and with that also their
unique ways of making films? speaking from personal experience, I never paid attention to those differences until i was told about some of them. I think for a lot of these
filmmakers it was scary to just express themselves freely when a lot of times these works aren’t fully understood due to their unique structure and background that many don’t
know about.
Finding similarities between filmmakers that come from the same background makes the process of understanding diasporic filmmakers and also exilic filmmakers. I have
not heard of many of these filmmakers before studying film here at Mount Holyoke and I wonder why is it that they are not that known? Through easier access to film in the
world that we live in now, I think there should be a moment where we look back and learn from them.
recording 1: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1B5lVHld2CxLCdLsLs…
recording 2: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1BWQALQuhDO0pQbJmO…
recording 3: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fSM1b9zw0N89OrnvK…
Traumatic Experience in the Diaspora Communities Discussion
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 Â points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 Â points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 Â points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Traumatic Experience in the Diaspora Communities Discussion
Traumatic Experience in the Diaspora Communities Discussion