Treatment of Cells with an Iron Chelator Question
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Treatment of Cells with an Iron Chelator Question
Treatment of cells with ____________, should result in _______________. Group of answer choices
Bortezomib (a proteasome inhibitor); removal of polyubiquitylated proteins
miRNA complementary to eIF2B mRNA; an increase in transcription
an iron chelator (removes excess cellular iron); a decrease in ferritin
transcription HSP inhibitors; an increase in protein degradation
Unfolded Proteins in the Endoplasmic Reticulum Question
Some diseases are caused by too many unfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Which of the following might be a potential therapeutic strategy?
Group of answer choices
Increasing glucosidase II in the ER lumen.
Increasing UDP-glucose in the ER lumen.
Decreasing calnexin in the ER.
Increasing ER mannosidase in the ER lumen.
Cytosol via Transmembrane Transport Question
Which statement regarding the transport of proteins is NOT correct?
Group of answer choices
Proteins move between the nucleus and cytosol via gated transport.
Proteins move from mitochondria to the cytosol via transmembrane transport.
Proteins move from the lumen of the Golgi apparatus to the cell exterior via vesicular transport. Nuclear pore complexes actively transport specific macromolecules, but also allow the free diffusion of smaller molecules.
Treatment of Cells with an Iron Chelator Question
Treatment of Cells with an Iron Chelator Question
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow