Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Discussion
1: Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research Understanding the strategies that have been developed to address issues of trustworthiness is the first step. The second step is considering how could I do that in my own research? It is important to recognize that it may not be feasible for you, as a novice researcher, to implement all possible strategies. For this Discussion, you will examine quality, trustworthiness, and credibility in qualitative research and provide specific techniques and strategies.
To prepare for this Discussion:
Review Chapter 11 of the Ravitch and Carl course text and the Shenton article related to trustworthiness in qualitative research. Use the Course Guide and Assignment Help to search for an article related to trustworthiness and/or quality in qualitative research.
By Thursday Post (TWO-PAGES) an explanation of how you ensure the quality, trustworthiness, and credibility of your qualitative research. Provide examples of specific techniques and strategies.
Use your Learning Resources as well as the article you found in your search to support your explanation. Use proper APA format, citations, and referencing.
By Friday Respond to at least one (ONE-PAGE) of your colleagues posts and search the Internet and/or the Walden Library for a different article related to trustworthiness and/or quality of qualitative research that offers other techniques or strategies. Explain how these other techniques or strategies might further ensure quality, trustworthiness, and credibility in qualitative research. Finally, evaluate the feasibility of your colleagues strategies. Reference the article you found to support your explanation. Use proper APA format, citations, and referencing. _____________________________________________________________________________________
Discussion 2: Ethics in Data Collection Research ethics in qualitative research starts with the presumption that the research process is the collaboration between researcher, participants, and context. At the same time, the researcher recognizes that she or he retains power over the data collection process, and the analysis and presentation of results. As a qualitative researcher, consider how you might accomplish your research objectives and biases with the feelings and privacy of your participants and sources. For this Discussion, you will explore the ethical challenges you will encounter as a qualitative researcher.
To prepare for this Discussion:
Review Chapter 11 of the Ravitch and Carl course text and consider ethics in qualitative research. Use the Course Guide and Assignment Help to search for an article related to protecting privacy, minimizing harm, or respecting the shared experience of others.
By Friday Post (TWO-PAGES) an explanation of the unique ethical challenges of protecting privacy, minimizing harm, and respecting the shared experience of others. Use your Learning Resources to support your explanation as well as the article you found in your search. Use proper APA format, citations, and referencing.
By Saturday Respond to at least one (ONE-PAGE) of your colleagues posts and explain what you found in your search related to protecting privacy, minimizing harm, and respecting the shared experiences of others. Provide a suggestion for overcoming the ethical challenge your colleague addressed in their post. Use the article you found in your search to support your response. Use proper APA format, citations, and referencing.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Trustworthiness in qualitative research |
Trustworthiness in qualitative research