Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Twitter as A Social Media Platform Discussion
Many people use social media these days for entertainment, connection with friends, or trying to find fame and fortune. I have recently discovered that many scientists and medical professionals use it as a legitimate networking tool. Networking is sort of like socializing for work–it is the act of meeting and staying in contact with people in your field. Sometimes this can help you get a job or obtain resources that you need.
This assignment is intended to:
1) Introduce you to the idea of networking and start doing it on your platform of choice, and
2) Have you find people who are pursuing similar career paths to your goal so that you can find out more about it from them.
ASSIGNMENT
Choose a social media platform. (If you are not sure where to start I suggest Twitter because that Is where I see a lot of networking happening. If social media is really not your thing, you can also use iNaturalist for this assignment.)
In social media you can either follow people or topics so either
Think about your career goals and search hashtags or topics that you can think of that might relate to it. Some examples are #ornithology, #gradschool or #medicaltwitter. There are a lot of groups like #BlackinSTEM and #LatininSTEM that might help you find people like yourself in these career paths as well. See what people have to say, or
Look at the web pages of professors at the University that you want to transfer to and see if they have any links to social media. See what they have to say on there.
Read some threads, see what people have to say, ask a quesiton or two, maybe even DM someone! A lot of young people who are Ph.D. students or postdoctoral scholars (postdocs) are very active in their accounts. Spend at least an hour–try not to get off topic!
Write a post in the Discussion about what you found. Describe what you searched and give the account names or hashtags that you found the most interesting and helpful. Did you decide to Follow anyone? Get any responses to questions? Let us know how it went.
Come back later and comment on someone else’s post. Ask a question about what they found or share with them something you found that you think they would like, too. Voila, you are networking!
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Twitter as A Social Media Platform Discussion |
Twitter as A Social Media Platform Discussion