type of ceremonial speech assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
type of ceremonial speech assignment
Make sure to reread the ceremonial speech directions before submitting.
SUBMISSION:
- Speech:
- Online courses must submit their speech via the media upload to the discussion below by the due date.
- Face to face courses will present their speech on their designated class date. Do notupload any videos.
Note: For face-to-face courses, any electronic visual must be uploaded to Canvas prior to class or brought on a USB drive. No email access will be allowed via the presentation computer.
Special Occasion/Ceremonial Speech – submitted to the Discussion Board
According to your textbook, this speech is meant to “invite listeners to agree with you about the value of a person, object, event or place the special occasion revolves around.”
This includes speeches of welcome, introduction, nomination, recognition, acceptance, and tribute. However, this style can also be used for commencement, commemorative, and keynote addresses in addition to farewells, and entertaining speeches.
Refer back to your Ceremonial Speech Outlines to focus on having clearly noticeable sections of the speech: Introduction, Body, Conclusion.
It is important to choose a topic you feel comfortable presenting and is appropriate for the audience that you will present to. It also must be clear what type of ceremonial speech you are presenting from the list above.
For specific values of the presentation, a rubric is provided for review below.
Length: 1-3 minutes. Deduction of 5 points for every 30 seconds under/over the time All speeches will be cut off regardless at 4 minutes.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow