Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Description
Microsoft® PowerPoint® Analysis (Assignment 2)
Create a PowerPoint presentation with 810 slides that fits the following requirements (excluding the title slide, table of contents slide, and references slide):
1. Investigate and identify two distinct terrorist organizations:
One domestic terrorist organization (examples: ALF, ELF, KKK, Aryan Nation, Black Liberation Army, Weathermen, Army of God)
One international terrorist organization (for example, Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, Hamas, the Irish Republican Army/IRA, and the Japanese Red Army/JRA)
2. Compare and contrast the similarities and differences between the two groups in the five areas below:
The group’s underlying ideology
Specific objectives or issues that the group is attempting to address
The kind of targets that the group prefers
The terrorist tactics that the organisation prefers to use in order to achieve its objectives
The group’s justification for justifying its terrorist acts and explaining why it believes these attacks will help it accomplish its claimed ultimate goals.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
An examination of Microsoft PowerPoint |
An examination of Microsoft PowerPoint