UC103 Responsibility Assignment Matrix Discussion

UC103 Responsibility Assignment Matrix Discussion

Instructions:

UC103 Responsibility Assignment Matrix Discussion

Initial Postings: Your initial post should be based upon the assigned reading for the week, so the textbook must be the only source utilized and listed in your reference section (and properly cited within the body of the text). Other sources are not required and are a waste of time to search and utilize. Only use the textbook.

Do not provide a Reflection or Chapter Overview. Provide only a graduate-level response to each of the following questions:

1) Thoroughly define and discuss the four different roles that are assigned in a RACI Chart. Why does at least one person/need to be Responsible for an Activity? Why is it necessary to have only one person assigned Accountability for an activity? What would be the issue if a person was assigned two roles (i.e., Responsible and Accountable or Accountable and Consult)?

Concentration of Health Services Discussion

Discussion post must be 10+ sentences and the peer reviews must be 7+ sentences please use your own words and do not copy from other sites stay on topic, be positive, and do not comment on grammar errors. Talk directly to classmates in peer reviews!!! You must complete both peer reviews and discussion question!! Thank you

1) discussion post

You have reached the end of this course. Many of you took this course as part of your concentration in project management while others took it as an elective. What are the top three things that you learned about project management that you did not know?

2) PEER REVIEW #1 (AMBER)

Hello Class –

This class was an elective for me, but I really enjoyed it. I definitely learned a lot that will follow me in whatever this degree will lead me. The top three things I learned in this course that I didn’t know before were, what EMV is and what it does, scope and the importance of it to a project, and finally the different project management structures and how they affect the project’s success.

All three of the assignments are something that will also follow me to my future. I stated in the assignment that while I was writing about a real-life scenario, I knew and understand that what I wrote wasn’t a complete guideline for a business I want to start. But it could be considered a helpful and small guideline to help me know where I should start.

I wish everyone the best of luck with future classes and degrees.

-Amber

3) PEER REVIEW #2(HEATHER)

I took this class as an elective in my business administration degree with a concentration of health services administration. I chose to take this class because I have participated in projects at work before and had interest in the management side of the project.

I aspire to be an operations manager in my company someday and I think the information in this course will be helpful in my future position.

The top three things I learned about project management that I did not know before that I will take with me into my career are: how to break up tasks into individual items, how to calculate project status through Earned Value Management, and how to schedule resources appropriately. Ultimately, I’m glad I chose to take this class as an elective because I think it is directly applicable to my work and career path.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow UC103 Responsibility Assignment Matrix Discussion

UC103 Responsibility Assignment Matrix Discussion

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!